Showing posts with label I WAS RIGHT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label I WAS RIGHT. Show all posts

Sunday, June 29, 2008

I was right: Obama's influence on names

I predicted here that Obama's candidacy/presidency would prompt more black Americans to give their children traditional African names, and that this trend might extend to Americans of all ethnicities giving their children names borrowed from other cultures.

What's happening instead, already, as this NYT article reports, is that grown Obama supporters are giving themselves his middle name, Hussein, as their middle names, adopting it as a symbol of solidarity in the face of all the anti-Muslim hysteria about his background.

So far Obama's campaign has done an extremely good job of managing Obama's "brand."  Obama-sponsored memes ("Yes we can") have been extremely successful.  And a couple of (planned?) physical-gesture memes that started out looking potentially damaging (the Jay-Z brush-off, the terrorist fist jab) were swiftly picked up and championed by pop culture (no question, the fist-bump is the new high-five).

Obama's imagery is powerful.  And the reason it's so powerful is that it's impeccably, vertically unified.  The campaign's power comes from the bottom up, but its themes and aesthetic come from the top down.  People interact with that imagery in a grassroots way -- make their own posters, buttons, etc. -- but they're using as their raw material the Obama "look."  That look is incredibly well-thought-out and designed to look right, sound right, feel right -- so when it gets repeated and repeated as it trickles through culture, it all reinforces the Obama message.  

What doesn't work is for the grassroots to come up with a meme and force it upwards, because it will clash with Obama's visual and rhetorical aesthetic.  And Hussein clashes.  Although Obama's middle name is a part of his "brand" (part of his name/"brand name") whether he likes it or not, it's not been chosen as part of his brand messaging.  And so what these kids are doing becomes unintentionally subversive of what Obama's trying to do.  The main problem with their gesture isn't that it adds to the false association between Obama and Islam (because, although it does, Obama is already treading the line on offending Muslims), but that it picks apart Obama's image when what's clearly been working best for him is summing-up, generalizing, unifying.  And because it picks apart instead of generalizing, it distracts from the candidate, leading us away into a debate on religion and race between individuals instead of back toward Obama and the mass movement.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

I was right: Lipstick

As I predicted here, it looks like lipstick is about to come back.  The NYT says it's because of the recession.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

I was right: Calvin Klein 90s minimalism

On December 8th I predicted that 1990s-era minimalism would come back and that Calvin Klein should capitalize on this. And on February 13th JC Report's review of "Recession-Friendly Style" in the fall collections said:
Calvin Klein rigorously adhered to the brand's minimalist DNA, with Francisco Costa skillfully executing clean, well-tailored clothes reminiscent of the house's '90s heyday.

It remains to be seen whether other designers will pick up on this trend and grow it. I still think so!

Thursday, February 21, 2008

I was right: Natural haircare & unhairdos

This article in today's (bad, bad!) NYT confirms both the trend towards the mainstreaming of natural (non-shampoo) hair care, which I wrote about in Long hair (penultimate paragraph), and the trend of messy, falling-apart hairdos, which I wrote about in Unhairdos.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

I was right: natural-colored shoes

Today Bill Cunningham's "On the Street" is about natural-colored shoes, which I wrote about spotting on the street on January 18th.